BAPTISM - NECESSARY FOR SALVATION?

INTRODUCTION
         This paper will examine the question, "Is the ordinance of  water baptism a necessary part of a persons salvation?"   In others words, is baptism mandatory and without it salvation, spending eternity with God, is not possible. Is it needed for the remission of sins?
        I do not discuss the  age for water baptism nor if baptism means full immersion or by sprinkling. I also do not address who has authority to baptize.

SUMMARY
        First let me say that water baptism is a commandment of God and is probably one of the easiest commandments to obey. I believe that all people that accept Jesus Christ as their Savior should be baptized as an act of obedience and as a public statement that Jesus Christ is their Savior and Lord. It represents the re-birth of the "born again" person. But, we go down into the water a sinner and we come out of the water a sinner. Baptism is not a part of our salvation, Jesus Christ and our faith in Him, already did all that was needed for this. Our righteousness comes from Him.

How could we possibly add to what our Savior did for us?

WORKS
        The Bible is clear that we are not saved by our works. We are saved only because of our faith in Jesus Christ, and that faith is a gift of God. Our salvation is not based upon anything we can do except respond to God's gift of eternal life (Eph 2:8; Gal 2:16-21 John 3:14-16, 36, 10:9; Rom 10:12-13; Rev 3:20; 1 Tim 2:4). We know that God draws us to Him and will lead us (Matt 16:17; John 6:44, 65; Is 42:16). It is also clear that our faith will allow God to work in us to produce what He wants (Eph 2:10; Phil 2:13).
        In Matthew 3:13-15 Jesus says baptism was "to fulfil all righteousness." But in Titus 3:5 we learn that works of righteousness do not save us.,

 Baptism is an activity, a works, and this is one of the reasons it is not a part of our salvation.

BAPTISM FOR REMISSION OF SINS?
        Some, like the Mormon Church, will use Acts 2:38 to show why baptism is mandatory. It has,

They use the term "for the remission of sins" to support their position. One biblical commentator said the following about Acts 2:38.
  I realize that by itself, without additional support, this argument may not seem very convincing, but more will be coming. Helping us to understand what Peter had in mind can come from Acts 10:43 where we learn that the he also taught that those with faith in Jesus Christ shall receive remission of sins (The NRSV says "forgiveness of sin"). We also know from Matthew 26:28 that our Lord Jesus' blood was shed for the remission of our sins. Nothing is said about baptism. And in Apostle Paul's epistle to the Romans we learn that our righteousness is from God. Why do we need to do something ourselves? We could not, in any way, add to what our Savior has done for us.

FROM MORMON SCRIPTURES
        For LDS I point to several of their Scriptures which have the same ideas as the commentary I quoted above, that baptism is "because of remission of sin", not "for remission of sins."

Note what is necessary for baptism - "that they have received of the Spirit of Christ unto the remission of their sins." Then they are baptized. In this next verse note who are being baptized. Within to days Mormon Church these people should be an obvious contradiction, as Mormon men cannot hold the priesthood without first being baptized and having the remission of their sins. Three more references define LDS doctrine. Note that nothing is said about remission of sins or baptism being part of the doctrine. Also note that "more or less than this" (adding or removing from the message), is against Jesus Christ. The following D&C verse has a similar idea. The following from the Book of Mormon, while it calls for baptism says nothing about the remission of sins coming from it. In the following LDS Scripture note what little children must do. Note what baptism does - "by the water ye keep the commandment". Note again that nothing is said about remission of sins.
 
MORE BIBLICAL VERSES
        Many will use the following from the Gospel of John to support their position about baptism. Some say that "born of water" means baptism. But they are obviously reading this into the text, as baptism is not mentioned. In verse 3 we learn that being "born again" is necessary to see the kingdom of God. And in verse 5 it says being "born of water and the spirit" is necessary to enter the kingdom of God. To me these are the same thing, they are one in the same. "Born again" is the same as "born of water and the sprit."  We also know from Romans 3:22 that our righteousness comes from Jesus Christ. We do not have to do anything and could not do anything, except for our heart felt faith in Him. And from the following we hear how we are born again. These make it clear that we are "born of God" by our faith in Jesus Christ and not from water baptism. Water baptism results from being "born again," and not the opposite.
      The term "born of water" can also be looked at in other ways. Some say it mean the fluid that is around us in our mothers womb, that ‘born of water" is our first birth. In our second birth we become a new person, "born again."  After our physical birth the Spirit then guides us to Christ (Matt 16:17; John 6:44, 65). A second possible understanding of "born of water" says that this phrase is referring to the word of God, as in  Ephesians 5:26; James 1:18 and 1 Peter 1:23. We are born of the word of God, we are washed by the word. In other words, "born of water and the spirt" means "born again....by the word of God" and "washing of water by the word." There are more biblical verses with a similar message. While this verse is saying we should be baptized, we are damned only by unbelief. In the following note that the Apostle Paul says he is glad he didn't baptize but two. What kind of an apostle would he be if baptism were necessary for salvation. The following is a summary of the gospel - note that nothing is said that baptism is part of it. >From Romans 1:16 we find that the gospel, which does not include baptism, "is the power of God unto salvation to every one the believeth." Note that believing (faith) is all that is required. In Acts 10:24-48 we find the example of Cornelius and his associates. They had the Holy Ghost fall on them and received the gift of the Holy Ghost before they were baptized. In Acts 11:16-17 Peter adds more to what this means when he recalls the apostles experience (Acts 1:5-8, 2:1-4; John 20:22). Three more examples can be found in Luke 1:35, 41, 67. In Luke 1:35 we learn that Mary had the Holy Ghost came upon her and she was overshadowed by the Highest. In 1:41 and 67 Elizabeth and Zacharias are filled with the Holy Ghost. None of these had  baptism for the remission of their sins at this time in their lives.
 
ONLY FAITH IS NEEDED
        There are many verses that tell that only our faith is needed for salvation. Here are some of them. Are we to ignore the many many verses that are very clear that only heart felt faith in Jesus Christ is all that is needed for our eternal salvation, that is spending eternity with God, so we can accept Acts 2:38 and John 3:2-7 which are not clear .

SOME MORE ISSUES:
         If baptism is a mandatory ordinance for salvation and remission of sins then there are some real life problems to consider. For example, what happens to one who has accepted Christ, but through no fault of their own die before they are baptized? Or a person that is in a place with no or insufficient water? Or a location with no "qualified" person (for those that require this) to do the baptism? These worldly problems would take salvation, which is only between God and man, and now inject a third party.
        If baptism is for the remission of sins then why is it not administered every time a person sins?
        Some will say that we must be baptized because Jesus Christ was. They say we must follow His example. And this is correct, but this is not a reason to say that baptism is needed for salvation. Did Jesus need baptism for the remission of His sins and for His salvation? Jesus was not baptized because He was a sinner, He was without sin. He was baptized as an example for us (Matt 3:15-16; John 1:30-34).

IN CLOSING
 We obtain our righteous by our faith in Jesus Christ (Rom 3:22), not from baptism. But, we should be baptized as a public sign of our faith in Jesus Christ and as an act of obedience.

John Farkas
Berean Christian Ministries, P.O. Box 1091, Webster, NY 14580

E-mail: bcmmin@frontiernet.net
Web page: http://www.bcmmin.org                       art/baptism2   3-13-98